E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Andina Licores S.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the movant “need only demonstrate that the factors specific to an anti-suit injunction weigh in favor of granting the injunction.”
• concluding central question of both cases was whether the 13 parties’ contract had been breached
• stating that “where private parties have previously agreed to litigate their disputes in a certain forum, one party’s filing first in a different forum would not implicate comity at all.”
• delaying issuance of the mandate to consider whether to impose sanctions pursuant to the court’s inherent authority
• treating a claim under an Ecuadorian decree the same as a claim for breach of contract
• adopting 25 Fifth Circuit approach establishing that a modified analysis for anti-suit injunctions applies rather 26 than the usual test for preliminary injunctions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).