E. F. Spears & Sons v. Winkle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissal proper because “[p]laintiffs do not identify specific contract provisions that support their assertions of how Defendants breached the CBA and other agreements.”
• “This is especially relevant . . . where [p]laintiffs provide no documents with their [c]omplaint, yet reference a plethora of agreements and correspondence that are central to their claims.”
• “This is especially relevant . . . where [p]laintiffs provide no documents with their [c]omplaint, yet reference a plethora of agreements and correspondence that are central to their claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).