E. E. Tripp Excavating Contractor, Inc. v. Jackson County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The most widely espoused justification for the rule is that specific enforcement of an arbitration agreement improperly ousts the courts of jurisdiction. Attempts by contract to foreclose judicial inquiry were against public policy.”
• ordering recommittal to arbitrators for specific findings differentiating damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).