E & E Hauling, Inc. v. Forest Preserve District Of Du Page County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• espousing that “[u]se of law normally will preclude a recovery of damages because the law will be a defense to a suit seeking damages unless it is clear the law is not to have that effect”
• \Mere refusal to perform a contract by a state does not raise a constitutional issue.\
• “If the action of the state does not preclude a damage remedy. . . there has been no law impairing the obligation of the contract.”
• “Mere refusal to perform a contract by a state does not raise a constitutional issue.”
• “Mere refusal to perform a contract by a state does not raise a constitutional issue, but when a state uses its legislative authority to impair a contract a constitutional claim is stated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).