· 12/29/1959
E & E ELECTRIC CO. v. Gold Coast 72nd Street Diner, Inc.
Citations
- 116 So. 2d 660
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It is apparent that if the work is an addition to the fee that it must, for the purpose of the mechanics’ hen law, be considered an improvement thereon.”
- “It is not the duty of the court to weigh the relative advantage to the fee owner of each structure erected. It is entirely possible that through mistakes in judgment it may happen that there are erected buildings which it would have been better not to build.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pearson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.