E-470 Public Highway Authority v. Revenig

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We may not read into a statute an exception that its plain language does not suggest, warrant, or mandate.”
• “We may not read into a statute an exception that its plain language does not suggest, warrant, or mandate.”
• “In Colorado, a ‘reasonably necessary’ consideration has been explicitly recognized to be part of a cost-shifting assessment and implicitly recognized to be part of an attorney fee-shifting assessment.”
• Under the abuse of discretion standard, we ask “not whether we would have reached a different result but, rather, whether the trial court's decision fell within a range of reasonable options.”
• in assessing whether a court abused its discretion, “we ask not whether we would have reached a different result but, rather, whether the trial court’s decision fell within a range of reasonable options”
• “ In assessing whether a trial court ’ s decision is manifestly unreasonable, arbitrary, or unfair, we as k not whether we would have reached a different result but, rather, wheth er the trial court ’ s decision fell within a range of reasonable option s. ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).