Dzurenda v. Gonzalez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that evidence indicating a law \disproportionately affects out-of-state companies\ is evidence of discriminatory effect
• observing that the Supreme Court “has failed to produce a readily discernable standard for distinguishing between statutes that have discriminatory effects and those that merely create incidental burdens” on interstate commerce
• observing that the Supreme Court “has failed to produce a readily discernable standard for distinguishing between statutes that have discriminatory effects and those that merely create incidental burdens” on interstate commerce

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).