Skip to main content
· 2/13/2007

Dzikowski v. Northern Trust Bank of Florida, N.A. (In Re Prudential of Florida Leasing, Inc.)

Citations

  • 478 F.3d 1291
  • 57 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 684
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 3263
  • 47 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 212
  • 2007 WL 445368

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that federal law, not state law, governs application of the single satisfaction rule under section 550(d)
  • applying federal common law to fill the interstices of the Bankruptcy Code with respect to settlement bar rules
  • agreeing with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that any up-front allocation by the parties would be self-serving when multiple claims are being settled in a single agreement
  • bankruptcy court was required to apply “federal rule of single satisfaction” “rather than Florida law”
  • ‘When the amount for which a cause of action has been settled is unclear because the settlement involved multiple injuries, claims, and parties, section 550(d
  • “When the district court does not address an issue, the proper course of action is often to vacate the order of the district court and remand.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pryor, Fay, Steele

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.