Dzienkiewicz v. Department of Correction

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that state medical examining board's decision awarding plaintiff disability retirement benefits was not binding evidentiary admission for purposes of workers' compensation proceeding and that commissioner did not abuse discretion in excluding it
• noting previous Connecticut Supreme Court case that applied abuse of discretion standard to decision of workers’ compensation commissioner to open award to allow new evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).