Dziekonski v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “plaintiff’s citation to the USERRA fails to establish jurisdiction in this Court”
• holding that “plaintiff’s citation to the USERRA fails to establish jurisdiction in this Court”
• noting that the ADA is not a money-mandating provision that would provide the United States Court of Federal Claims with jurisdiction
• noting that a statute describing a “declared policy” is not money-mandating
• “Assuming plaintiff were to make out a cognizable criminal violation claim, the Court of Federal Claims lacks jurisdiction to entertain criminal matters.”
• “Assuming plaintiff were to make out a cognizable criminal violation claim, the Court of Federal Claims lacks jurisdiction to entertain criminal matters.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).