Skip to main content
· 7/1/1731

Dyson v. Parriss

Citations

  • 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 352

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • giving preclusive effect to an Article 78 proceeding, which at the time permitted broader review of Section 3020-a hearings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.