Skip to main content
· 5/13/1991

Dyson v. King County

Citations

  • 809 P.2d 769
  • 61 Wash. App. 243
  • 1991 Wash. App. LEXIS 156

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the county estopped from asserting the plaintiff had failed to comply with a notice of claim provision because it \waited until the applicable statute of limitations had run\ before raising the defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.