Skip to main content
· 11/30/1989

Dyson v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

Citations

  • 566 A.2d 1065
  • 1989 D.C. App. LEXIS 273
  • 1989 WL 146322

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \the formal filing of a claim may not be the only way an employee may acquire the protection of the retaliatory discharge provision [of the workers' compensation statute]\
  • “the formal filing of a claim may not be the only way an employee may acquire the protection of the retaliatory discharge provision [of the workers’ compensation statute]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steadman, Schwelb, Farrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.