Dyson v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing the plaintiff’s Title VII claims as untimely because the plaintiff did not file her EEOC charge within the three-hundred-day time period
• dismissing the plaintiff's Title VII claims as untimely because the plaintiff did not file her EEOC charge within the three-hundred-day time period
• declining supplemental jurisdiction over claims arising from D.C. law because “the remaining issues are best resolved by the state court”
• declining supplemental jurisdiction over claims arising from D.C. law because “the remaining issues are best resolved by the state court”
• “[The] defendant confuses [42 U.S.C. §] 1981a with 42 U.S.C. § 1981(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).