· 11/17/2004
Dynegy Marketing & Trade v. Enron Corp. (In Re Enron Corp.)
Citations
- 316 B.R. 767
- 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23352
- 43 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 252
- 2004 WL 2624878
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying leave to appeal stay order where affirmance on appeal would “not expedite the litigation” and reversal was “likely to complicate” it
- order enjoining enforcement of netting agreement was interlocutory because it was “unimaginable” that the bankruptcy judge would not “revisit” the issue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kaplan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.