Skip to main content
· 11/17/2004

Dynegy Marketing & Trade v. Enron Corp. (In Re Enron Corp.)

Citations

  • 316 B.R. 767
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23352
  • 43 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 252
  • 2004 WL 2624878

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying leave to appeal stay order where affirmance on appeal would “not expedite the litigation” and reversal was “likely to complicate” it
  • order enjoining enforcement of netting agreement was interlocutory because it was “unimaginable” that the bankruptcy judge would not “revisit” the issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaplan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.