Dynasty Express Corp. v. Weiss

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rule 1.540(b)(3) case where witness gave testimony in federal court that was directly contrary to his testimony in state lawsuit
• in order to warrant an evidentiary hearing under rule 1.540(b)(3) [fraud], motion must specify the essential facts and not merely assert legal conclusions
• “If the allegations in the moving party’s motion for relief from judgment raise a colorable entitlement to ... relief, a formal eviden-tiary hearing on the motion, as well as permissible discovery prior to the hearing, is required.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).