New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 4/4/2005

Dynasty Bldg. Corp. v. Ackerman

Citations

870 A.2d 629
376 N.J. Super. 280

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

applying a six-year statute of limitation to a claim for conversion although the statute had not expired on the facts of that case
applying a six-year statute of limitations to claims of conversion and breach of fiduciary duty
declining to set aside default despite flawed notice, absent prejudice to the defendant
\[T]he running of the statute of limitations is an affirmative defense that must be raised in the defendant's answer.\
\Whether or not an action that is governed by a statute of limitations is time barred should be A-5423-18 24 determined on the basis of that statute and not on the basis of the equitable doctrine of laches.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Petrella, Lintner and Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.