· 4/4/2005
Dynasty Bldg. Corp. v. Ackerman
Citations
- 870 A.2d 629
- 376 N.J. Super. 280
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying a six-year statute of limitation to a claim for conversion although the statute had not expired on the facts of that case
- applying a six-year statute of limitations to claims of conversion and breach of fiduciary duty
- declining to set aside default despite flawed notice, absent prejudice to the defendant
- \[T]he running of the statute of limitations is an affirmative defense that must be raised in the defendant's answer.\
- \Whether or not an action that is governed by a statute of limitations is time barred should be A-5423-18 24 determined on the basis of that statute and not on the basis of the equitable doctrine of laches.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Petrella, Lintner and Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.