Skip to main content
· 4/4/2005

Dynasty Bldg. Corp. v. Ackerman

Citations

  • 870 A.2d 629
  • 376 N.J. Super. 280

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying a six-year statute of limitation to a claim for conversion although the statute had not expired on the facts of that case
  • applying a six-year statute of limitations to claims of conversion and breach of fiduciary duty
  • declining to set aside default despite flawed notice, absent prejudice to the defendant
  • \[T]he running of the statute of limitations is an affirmative defense that must be raised in the defendant's answer.\
  • \Whether or not an action that is governed by a statute of limitations is time barred should be A-5423-18 24 determined on the basis of that statute and not on the basis of the equitable doctrine of laches.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Petrella, Lintner and Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.