Dymo Industries, Inc. v. Tapeprinter, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The grant of a preliminary injunction is the exercise of a very far reaching power 16 never to be indulged in except in a case clearly warranting it.”
• “The grant of a preliminary injunction is the exercise of a very far reaching 19 power never to be indulged in except in a case clearly warranting it.”
• “The grant of a preliminary injunction is the exercise of a very far reaching 22 power never to be indulged in except in a case clearly warranting it.”
• “The grant of a preliminary 13 injunction is the exercise of a very far reaching power never to be indulged in except in a 14 case clearly warranting it.”
• “The grant of a preliminary injunction 17 the exercise of a very far reaching power never to be indulged in except in a case clearly 18 || warranting it.”’
• “The grant of a preliminary 4 injunction is the exercise of a very far reaching power never to be indulged in except in a 5 case clearly warranting it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).