Skip to main content
· 8/3/1979

Dymo Industries, Inc. v. Monarch Marking Systems, Inc.

Citations

  • 474 F. Supp. 412
  • 206 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 185
  • 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10615

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering evidence of reliance on opinion of invalidity but noting that opinion was based in part on plaintiff’s failure to sue; estoppel not defeated by partial reliance on such an opinion of counsel where coupled with actual reliance on delay
  • delay alone is insufficient to bar patentee from enforcing his patent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patrick E. Higginbotham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.