Dylan T Myers v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court “may only assume broad equitable powers when the statutory or Constitutional grant of power is equally broad”
• rejecting disgorgement even though it “may act to ‘prevent and restrain’ future violations by general deterrence insofar as it makes RICO violations unprofitable”
• court should not “expand upon our equitable jurisdiction if . . . we are restricted by the statutory language”
• “litigant does not properly raise an issue by addressing it in a cursory fashion, with only bare-bones arguments”
• “The words ‘including, but not limited to’ introduce a non-exhaustive list that sets out specific examples of a general principle.”
• “prevent and restrain” in the RICO statute “indicates that the jurisdiction is limited to forward-looking remedies that are aimed at future violations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).