Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that courts may consider parol evidence to determine parties’ intent when contract language is ambiguous
• “Consequently, the judgment of dismissal with prejudice and on the merits was an adjudication that extinguished and discharged the right of the Dykes to bring claims against Superior in a subsequent lawsuit....”
• stating standard for ambiguity of a contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).