DYKES BY DYKES v. City of Apalachicola

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that McCain should be applied to determine whether a city was liable for trees and bushes obstructing view
• holding that the test to determine whether city was liable for trees and bushes which allegedly contributed to an accident was whether defendant's conduct created a \foreseeable zone of risk\
• holding that the test to determine whether city was liable for trees and bushes which allegedly contributed to an accident was whether defendant's conduct created a \foreseeable zone of risk\
• characterizing the rule of Anglin as applicable “only when conduct obviously falls within ‘unusual, extraordinary or bizarre’ category”
• reversing trial court's conclusion that driver's negligence in hitting a pedestrian constituted an intervening and superseding cause relieving the city of liability for allowing foliage to grow into the right-of-way
• applying McCain to determine liability of city for trees and bushes along right-of-way obstructing view of motorists

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).