Dykeman v. Ashton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to address alleged errors when appellant failed to set forth challenged jury instructions in brief or appendix as required by appellate rules
• declining to address alleged errors when appellant failed to set forth challenged jury instructions in brief or appendix as required by appellate rules
• finding no prejudice where nothing in record indicated correction of error complained of would have affected defendant’s ability to prepare for trial
• reviewing family court’s ruling on motion to continue for abuse of discretion
• finding waiver based on failure to comply with formal appellate rules
• “[I]t will not be presumed that an error is prejudicial so as to require reversal, but the prejudice must appear from the record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).