Skip to main content
· 10/24/1984

Dyer v. Texas Electric Service Co.

Citations

  • 680 S.W.2d 883
  • 1984 Tex. App. LEXIS 4791

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • electric line built to serve one customer was for public use because it enhanced oil production by customer
  • condemnation for electric power line was public use despite serving one customer because arguably would benefit public through increased oil production by customer
  • power line to serve single customer, Gulf, would arguably benefit public by increasing oil production of Gulf

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Preslar, Ward, Schulte

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.