· 10/24/1984
Dyer v. Texas Electric Service Co.
Citations
- 680 S.W.2d 883
- 1984 Tex. App. LEXIS 4791
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- electric line built to serve one customer was for public use because it enhanced oil production by customer
- condemnation for electric power line was public use despite serving one customer because arguably would benefit public through increased oil production by customer
- power line to serve single customer, Gulf, would arguably benefit public by increasing oil production of Gulf
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Preslar, Ward, Schulte
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.