Dyer v. Criegler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the test for possession includes both the present intent to control the object and the ability to control it
• reaching the same conclusion regarding the definition of “owner” in the Lead Paint Act
• reaching the same conclusion regarding the definition of \owner\ in the Lead Paint Act
• discussing the expanded meaning of the term \owner\ under a similar definition
• “In defining ‘owner,’ the Housing Code uses language nearly identical to that found in the Lead Paint Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).