Skip to main content
· 8/8/1997

Dye v. United States

Citations

  • 121 F.3d 1399
  • 1997 Colo. J. C.A.R. 1623
  • 80 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6006
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 21125
  • 1997 WL 450089

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that expenditures for attorney's fees are not capital expenditures if incurred to secure taxable, ordinary income
  • explaining “the ultimate question presented for decision, upon a claim for refund, is whether the taxpayer has overpaid his tax[,]” and plaintiffs must show the amount paid “exceed[s] the amount which might have been properly assessed and demanded” (citation omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Porfilio, Barrett, Ebel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.