· 8/8/1997
Dye v. United States
Citations
- 121 F.3d 1399
- 1997 Colo. J. C.A.R. 1623
- 80 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6006
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 21125
- 1997 WL 450089
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that expenditures for attorney's fees are not capital expenditures if incurred to secure taxable, ordinary income
- explaining “the ultimate question presented for decision, upon a claim for refund, is whether the taxpayer has overpaid his tax[,]” and plaintiffs must show the amount paid “exceed[s] the amount which might have been properly assessed and demanded” (citation omitted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Porfilio, Barrett, Ebel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.