· 2/24/2014
Dydzak v. U.S. Dist. Court for the Cent. Dist. of Cal.
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 1362
- 188 L. Ed. 2d 294
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3491
- 571 U.S. 1194
- 2014 WL 684040
- 2014 U.S. LEXIS 1582
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- exercising jurisdiction to review a nondiscretionary decision concerning ineligibility for adjustment of status
- panel noted Nasrallah “may have partially abrogated portions of Cardoso” but declined to express an opinion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.