Skip to main content
· 2/24/2014

Dydzak v. U.S. Dist. Court for the Cent. Dist. of Cal.

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 1362
  • 188 L. Ed. 2d 294
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3491
  • 571 U.S. 1194
  • 2014 WL 684040
  • 2014 U.S. LEXIS 1582

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • exercising jurisdiction to review a nondiscretionary decision concerning ineligibility for adjustment of status
  • panel noted Nasrallah “may have partially abrogated portions of Cardoso” but declined to express an opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.