Dxs, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, F/k/a Flint X-Ray, Inc. v. Siemens Medical Systems, Inc., a Foreign Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that notifying third parties about a policy was a new and independent act vis-a-vis the policy, when the defendant had never taken any previous action to implement the policy
• describing a continuing antitrust violation as a violation in which the plaintiffs interests are repeatedly invaded and requiring an overt act to restart the statute of limitations
• “For statute of limitations purposes, the focus is on the timing of the causes of action, i.e., the defendant’s overt acts, as opposed to the effects of the overt acts.”
• “A continuing antitrust violation is one in which the plaintiff’s interests are repeatedly invaded.” (citation omitted)
• “Damages for lost profits must be based on the loss of net profits rather than gross profits. ‘Any other rule would obviously grant the offended litigant a greater sum than he would have earned had the breach not occurred.’” (internal citation omitted) (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).