Dwight v. Merritt
Citations
- 140 U.S. 213
- 11 S. Ct. 768
- 35 L. Ed. 450
- 1891 U.S. LEXIS 2455
Syllabus
<p>In an aetion against a collector to recover back an alleged excess of duties imposed upon an importation of iron rails, the duty having been imposed upon them as “ iron bars for railroads ” under Rev. Stat. § 2504, Schedule E, and the importer claiming that they were subject to duty as “ wrought scrap iron ” under the same schedule, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff to satisfy the jury that they had been in actual use before exportation, and that fact must be proved in order to recover.</p> <p>The dutiable classification of articles imported must be ascertained by an examination óf them, and not by their description in the invoice.</p> <p>The statutes codified in the Revised Statutes and repealed with their enactment may be referred to in order to interpret the meaning of obscure and ambiguous phrases in the revision; but not when the meaning is clear and free from doubt.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the “phrase ‘nothing shall 11 be deemed scrap-iron except,’ etc., clearly shows that there might be other classes or kinds of scrap-iron known to the trade than those mentioned . . . under that clause of the statute”
- applying the rule in Worthington to determine the correct classification of the merchandise
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lamar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Shaun K. O'NeilFirst Circuit· 1993-12-15· cited 165×
- United States v. CitroenSupreme Court· 1912-02-19· cited 98×
- Harley Co. v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1926-05-08· cited 30×
- Heartland By-Products, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of International Trade· 1999-10-19· cited 18×
- Engis Equipment Co. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1969-01-20· cited 15×
- United States v. HannevigCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1920-04-13· cited 12×
- Midwest Waste Material Co. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1951-12-20· cited 11×
- Morrow v. Warner Valley Stock Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1909-04-13· cited 10×
- Moore v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1910-11-30· cited 6×
- Akawo & Co. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1941-05-19· cited 6×
- The LilyNinth Circuit· 1934-03-16· cited 5×
- Wallace Pencil Co. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1941-12-17· cited 4×
- Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni Imperial Rug Mills, Inc. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1966-09-12· cited 4×
- Broadway Hale Stores, Inc. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1969-04-30· cited 3×
- United States v. NelsonD. Idaho· 1912-09-05· cited 3×
- United States v. Schroeder & Tremayne, Inc.U.S. Customs Court· 1953-02-18· cited 2×
- General Shipping & Trading Co. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1956-03-16· cited 2×
- Feder v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1967-04-06· cited 2×
- R. L. Ginsburg & Sons v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York· 1906-02-28· cited 2×
- California Bag & Metal Co. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1939-02-09· cited 1×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Other cases named Dwight v. Merritt
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.