· 5/15/1881
Dwight v. Dada
Citations
- 31 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 659
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allegations of both individual and derivative claims sufficient to state separate causes of action
- allegations of both individual and derivative claims sufficient to state separate causes of action
- action to prevent dilution of votes proper subject for direct action
- “The right to vote is often consid ered a shareholder’s most fundamental right.”
- \The right to vote is basic and fundamental to most shares of stock and is independent of any right that the corporate entity possesses and the shareholder could enforce and protect such rights by bringing a direct action.\ (footnotes omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.