Skip to main content
· 11/29/2011

Dwight Almond, III v. Unified School District 501

Citations

  • 665 F.3d 1174
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 23718
  • 94 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,339
  • 113 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1473
  • 2011 WL 5925312

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “hiring, firing, promotion, demotion, and transfer decisions, though often touching on pay, should and do accrue” as soon as the employee is aware of the decision
  • holding that the FPA does not apply to a demotion claim
  • stating that the 300-day period begins the date the employee learns of the adverse employment action
  • stating that compliance with ADEA’s similar 300-day limitation period “is a condition precedent to bringing suit”
  • explaining that the Supreme Court’s ruling in Morgan does not alter the rule that discrete acts of discrimination “trigger the statute of limitations when announced to the claimant” (quoting Morgan, 536 U.S. at 114)
  • explaining that the Supreme Court’s ruling in Morgan does not alter the rule that discrete acts of discrimination “trigger the statute of limitations when announced to the claimant” (quoting Morgan, 536 U.S. at 114)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Brorby, Gorsuch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.