Dwelle v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the lower court erroneously relied on [the child’s] statement of future residency intent in deciding he was not entitled” to coverage under his parents’ policies
• under an “alternative second theory,” even if the child was not a resident of his parents’ home, he was covered as a child away at school
• \the lower court erroneously relied on [the child's] statement of future residency intent in deciding he was not entitled\ to coverage under his parents' policies
• newly married groom had not established a separate household from his parents at time of accident, although he had lived away recently while attending college
• \the lower court erroneously relied on [the child's] statement 40 No. 1-14-0447 of future residency in deciding he was not entitled\ to coverage under his parents' policies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).