Dwayne Clay, M.D., P.C. v. Government Employees Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Clay has not argued that, even if the nonassignability clause is valid and enforceable, operation of the clause, as drafted, would not reach a post-accident assignment of [the assignor’s] anticipated uninsured motorist benefits.”
• reiterating the remedial purpose of uninsured motorist insurance statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).