DW Aina Le'a Development, LLC v. Bridge Aina Le'a, LLC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that state circuit court erred in determining that Bridge’s due process rights under federal and state constitutions were violated
• concluding that reversion of property to agricultural use violated section 205-4 of Hawaii Revised Statutes
• concluding that state circuit court erred in determining that Bridge’s equal protection rights under federal and state constitutions were violated
• ruling that documents that were not part of the record before the Land Use Commission should have been stricken from the record on appeal
• “The [Commission] did not err in issuing the OSC. Bridge and DW do not contend otherwise.” (citation omitted)
• “If a case can be decided on either of two grounds, one involving a constitutional question, the other a question of statutory construction or general law, . . . [this court] will decide only the latter.” (alterations in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).