D.V.S. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing the defendant’s robbery conviction based on insufficient evidence because “ ‘the taking was completed without any use of force and the property abandoned before any force was employed’ ”
• reversing the defendant’s robbery conviction based on insufficient evidence because “ ‘the taking was completed without any use of force and the property abandoned before any force was employed’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).