Dvc-Jpw Investors v. Norman H. Gershman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• not “short and plain” when plaintiff's complaint was 6 “argumentative . . . prolix in evidentiary detail, yet without simplicity, conciseness and clarity,” 7 “replete with redundancy, and largely irrelevant,” and consisting of “largely immaterial 8 background information”
• “We do not think that the FDA requires an ingredient list so that manufacturers can 6 mislead consumers and then rely on the ingredient list to correct those misinterpretations and 7 provide a shield for liability for the deception.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).