Duvall v. South Carolina Budget & Control Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The Court must presume the Legislature intended its statutes to accomplish something and did not intend a futile act.\
• \The Court must presume the Legislature intended its statutes to accomplish something and did not intend a futile act.\
• \The [c]ourt must presume the [l]egislature intended its statutes to accomplish something and did not intend a futile act.\
• “When the Legislature adopts an amendment to a statute, this [cjourt recognizes a presumption that the Legislature intended to change the existing law.”
• “When construing statutory language, the statute must be read as a whole, and sections which are part of the same general statutory law must be construed together and each one given effect.”
• “The Court must presume the Legislature intended its statutes to accomplish something and did not intend a futile act.” (citing TNS Mills, Inc. v. S.C. Dep’t of Revenue, 331 S.C. 611, 620, 503 S.E.2d 471, 476 (1998))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).