DUVAL COUNTY LAND TRUST 113015-0225 v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., JEAN ALTEUS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that notice “met the due-process baseline” by providing “potential class members an address, phone number, and website with which to obtain more information about the proposed settlement”
• finding that defendant who did not appeal initial injunction order could not bootstrap otherwise untimely appeal by appealing denial of motion to reconsider
• finding error harmless even though district court stated it must presume plaintiffs’ allegations to be true and only conduct a limited factual inquiry
• rejecting a similar argument and concluding that the district court “probed behind the pleadings, considering all of the relevant documents that were in evidence”
• stating that “all that the notice must do is fairly apprise . . . prospective members of the class of the terms of the proposed settlement so that class members may come to 26 and citations omitted
• noting that most common-fund fee percentages ranged from 20% to 30%

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).