D'Uva v. Wheeler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Microsoft applies when there are “similar statutory restrictions [to Rule 23(f)] that would be adversely affected by permitting voluntary dismissal of claims with prejudice”
• noting that “a party seeking to establish fraud on the court must meet a high standard” and must demonstrate “fraudulent conduct . . . [that] harmed the integrity of the judicial process” (citation omitted)
• “To prevail, the moving party must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the verdict was obtained through fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct.” (citation modified)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).