Dutton v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that 1993 recodification of juvenile code left many provisions \substantially unchanged\
• applying that principle and citing other authorities
• “When a general statute and a specific statute both purport to control an area of law, this court considers the specific statute to take precedence over an inconsistent general statute related to the same subject.”
• “When a general statute and a specific statute both purport to control an area of law, this court considers the specific statute to take precedence over an inconsistent general statute related to the same subject.”
• “When a general statute and a specific statute both purport to control an area of law, this court considers the specific statute to take precedence over an inconsistent gen- eral statute related to the same subject.”
• appellate courts have independent duty to examine jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).