Dutch Run-Mays Draft, LLC v. Betty B. Woomer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that we will not find error based on evidence that was not part of the record below
• stating that when reviewing a district court’s preliminary-injunction ruling, we restrict our inquiry to facts in the district court’s record
• noting that “[a]n appellate court may not consider facts which were not before the district court at the time of the challenged ruling” (ellipsis and internal quotation marks omitted)
• recognizing our review is limited to the evidence that was before the district court
• limiting review to the evidence before the district court at the time of the preliminary injunction hearing
• discussing the three speech forums: the traditional public forum, the designated public forum, and the nonpublic forum

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).