Dusty Authement v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an agency-interpretation established through less formal means than “notice and comment rule-making” may still be afforded judicial deference
• holding that the “‘12 month’ duration requirements apply to both the ‘impairment’ and the ‘inability’ to work requirements.”
• holding that the “‘12 month’ duration requirements apply to both the ‘impairment’ and the 28 | ‘inability’ to work requirements”
• holding that the “‘12 month’ duration requirements apply to both the ‘impairment’ and the ‘inability’ to work requirements.”
• holding that the Social Security Act requires both the impairment and the subsequent inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity to last twelve months to meet the durational requirement
• holding that the Social Security Act requires both the impairment and the subsequent inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity to last twelve months to meet the durational requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).