Dusoe v. Mobil Oil Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Blackmore controls and “Massachusetts law requir[es] plaintiffs to show proof of actual contamination to maintain a private nuisance claim.”
• concluding that company’s conduct was not extreme and outrageous where evidence did not show that company “knowingly contaminated the plaintiffs’ water supply” or that it “engaged in an ‘extensive cover-up’ of its allegedly unlawful behavior”
• “A negligence action may not be maintained unless one has suffered injury or damage that is causally connected to a breach of duty”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).