Skip to main content
· 10/11/1996

Dusin v. Riggs

Citations

  • 22 Kan. App. 2d 919
  • 924 P.2d 660
  • 1996 Kan. App. LEXIS 120

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming denial of defendant’s motion to amend their answer after the cut-off to amend the pleadings
  • affirming district court’s denial of defendant’s motion for leave to amend answer to add two counterclaims after plaintiff had filed a motion for summary judgment because there was no justification for the delay and evidence the amendment would prejudice the plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gernon, Lewis, Wahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.