· 10/11/1996
Dusin v. Riggs
Citations
- 22 Kan. App. 2d 919
- 924 P.2d 660
- 1996 Kan. App. LEXIS 120
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming denial of defendant’s motion to amend their answer after the cut-off to amend the pleadings
- affirming district court’s denial of defendant’s motion for leave to amend answer to add two counterclaims after plaintiff had filed a motion for summary judgment because there was no justification for the delay and evidence the amendment would prejudice the plaintiff
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gernon, Lewis, Wahl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.