Dusenbury v. Strathcona Apartments, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that MHL “article 10 provides for a host of procedural protections” including that the “respondent has a right to counsel”
• stating “[t]he potential for indefinite confinement threatens a liberty interest of the highest order”
• stating \[t]he potential for indefinite confinement threatens a liberty interest of the highest order\
• “In many [MHL] article 10 trials, expert testimony may be the only thing a jury hears.”
• “we have held that hearsay may play a role in an expert’s testimony because the expert may base an opinion on hearsay if it ‘is of a kind accepted in the profession as reliable in forming a professional opinion’”
• “we have held that hearsay may play a role in an expert’s testimony because the expert may base an opinion on hearsay if it ‘is of a kind accepted in the profession as reliable in forming a professional opinion’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).