Connecticut Appellate Court· 7/24/2001
Durso v. Aquilino
Citations
- 64 Conn. App. 469
- 780 A.2d 937
- 2001 Conn. App. LEXIS 379
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- claim of error is not reviewable where objection to admission of evidence was withdrawn at trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stoughton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. NicholsonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-08-20· cited 19×
- State v. GonzalezConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-05-14· cited 17×
- Medes v. Geico Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2006-09-26· cited 10×
- State v. SpringmannConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-04-30· cited 10×
- Harrison v. HamziConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-06-17· cited 10×
- State v. Gang JinConnecticut Appellate Court· 2018-01-09· cited 4×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Purzycki v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-03-17· cited 195×
- Swenson v. SawoskaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-05-22· cited 74×
- Skrzypiec v. NoonanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-11-23· cited 67×
- State v. PounceySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-07-22· cited 66×
- Turk v. SilbersteinConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-03-24· cited 12×
- Nevers v. Van ZuilenConnecticut Appellate Court· 1997-09-30· cited 10×
- State v. RodriguezConnecticut Appellate Court· 1987-03-31· cited 9×
- Puchalsky v. RappahahnConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-04-24· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.