Durrance v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he state fulfilled its obligation under the rule by disclosing the trial testimony in its supplemental response to defendant’s request for discovery. The defendant has the burden of inspecting and copying the trial testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jaime Deandre Brown v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-05-20· cited 14×
• Kipp v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-12-18· cited 8×
• Hicks v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-09-22· cited 6×
• Jerry Ward v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-05-27· cited 2×
• RUSSELL MOON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-05-12

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Richardson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1971-03-31· cited 927×
• State v. Schopp
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-03-23· cited 199×
• Scipio v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2006-02-16· cited 86×
• State v. Williams
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-08-07· cited 6×
• B.T.G. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-16· cited 6×