Skip to main content
· 12/9/2005

Durney v. WAVECREST LABORATORIES, LLC

Citations

  • 441 F. Supp. 2d 1055
  • 65 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 839
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42580
  • 2005 WL 4438689

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The test is not whether or not the claim was litigated, but whether or not there was a final judgment on the merits.”
  • “removed from the court’s docket in such a way that the plaintiff is foreclosed from filing a suit again on the same claim or claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.