Durm v. Heck's, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the absence of language in an order indicating that there is not just reason for delay pursuant to Rule 54(b
• recognizing that an order which approximates a final order in its nature and effect may be considered a final order under W. Va. R. Civ. P. 54(b)
• “Generally, an order qualifies as a final order when it ‘ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment.’”
• “Where an order . . . completely disposes of any issues of liability as to that party, the absence of language prescribed by Rule 54(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).