Skip to main content
· 10/25/1993

Durkin v. Hansen

Citations

  • 437 S.E.2d 550
  • 313 S.C. 343
  • 1993 S.C. App. LEXIS 169

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that specific duties imposed by the South Carolina Residential Landlord and Tenant Act and a rental agreement created a nondelegable duty for landlords
  • holding, under § 419 of Restatement (Second) of Torts, that landlord could be liable for negligence of independent contractor based on nondelegable duty of reasonable care to tenants
  • holding, under § 419 of Restatement (Second) of Torts, that landlord could be liable for negligence of independent contractor based on nondelegable duty of reasonable care to tenants
  • finding that a landlord could be held liable for a cleaning company’s breach and, by implication, that the cleaning company had duty to leave condominium in safe condition
  • holding, under § 419 of Restatement (Second) of Torts, that landlord could be liable for negligence of independent contractor based on nondelegable duty of reasonable care to tenants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.